6066 (1960-1966) GMC Truck Club

6066 (1960-1966) GMC Truck Club (https://6066gmcclub.com/index.php)
-   General Discussion (https://6066gmcclub.com/forumdisplay.php?f=8)
-   -   25% of stove bolt post are wrong info. (https://6066gmcclub.com/showthread.php?t=48350)

wsignman December 5th, 2014 11:20 PM

Re: 25% of stove bolt post are wrong info.
 
I heard that Ford & Chrysler went selling trucks because of V6 out worked their V8s

bigblockv6 December 5th, 2014 11:34 PM

Re: 25% of stove bolt post are wrong info.
 
I would have to say that held true for medium duty and heavy duty trucks not pickups. My father owned a grocery store in San Francisco and in the late 60 to early 70's I could remember the majority of medium duty trucks that made deliveries were GMC V6 trucks and there was one liquor distributor made deliveries in a HM-7500 series. Some of the bigger companies were Gallo wines, Nabisco and Morell all had GMC V6 powered trucks. Of course our delivery truck was a 62 GMC K1000 then the 68 KM2500.

Hantke December 15th, 2014 11:11 PM

Re: 25% of stove bolt post are wrong info.
 
So is anybody here on jalopy? The general consensus seems to be that the 305 V6 in a truck will get 4-7mpg if you are lucky, is it me, or does that seem kind of low? I thought 12 was a more appropriate number


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

FetchMeAPepsi December 15th, 2014 11:17 PM

Re: 25% of stove bolt post are wrong info.
 
12 is closer. Most I've read seem to be around 10, with a general range of 9-12.

Hantke December 15th, 2014 11:20 PM

Re: 25% of stove bolt post are wrong info.
 
Okay, cool, that's more doable than 4. I'm assuming it's that kind of info that gets these engines dropped in the scrap yard


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

FetchMeAPepsi December 15th, 2014 11:52 PM

Re: 25% of stove bolt post are wrong info.
 
I agreee. And I've heard of people change out the rear ends and transmissions and get 15-20 mpg out of them too. I guess if they're geared right they aren't much different than modern trucks in the gas department.

Hantke December 16th, 2014 12:54 AM

Re: 25% of stove bolt post are wrong info.
 
Yeah some guy claimed 25 with a custom milled intake and a Holley racing carb on one of the hot rod forums. I suppose if you build the gears for a high torque low rpm motor I could see good mileage


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

bigblockv6 December 16th, 2014 04:25 AM

Re: 25% of stove bolt post are wrong info.
 
10-12 mpg from my experience has always been the average on a 305 V6, my 68 KM-2500 would get that with 4.56 gears which I think is fairly reasonable from a 3/4 ton 4wd truck. Now if you're running a 1/2 ton with 3.07 gears it's possible to do better. Former member Rick Rusconi was getting 19 mpg in his 62 1/2 ton with the 305 V6 equipped with the Holley 500 cfm 2bbl carb running 3.07 gears and overdrive. After the 401M conversion he's getting 17 mpg.

Hantke December 16th, 2014 04:26 AM

Re: 25% of stove bolt post are wrong info.
 
That's still pretty good! I would be good with 15 any day


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

6066gmcguy December 17th, 2014 01:39 AM

Re: 25% of stove bolt post are wrong info.
 
My 1965 2500 has 4.56:1 gearing and it got about 10mpg. the Rescue Squad I have not checked to see what the mileage is, 3500 with 305 1:1 top geare in trans, and 6.71 rear axle, I got 22.5" wheels on it as well, came stock with 20".


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:49 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.