6066 (1960-1966) GMC Truck Club Bitcoin now accepted here! 
Pay Dues
Pay Dues or become a Site Supporter
 



Go Back   6066 (1960-1966) GMC Truck Club > 6066 GMC Truck Club Forum > GMC V6 and V12 Engines
#Sponsored

GMC V6 and V12 Engines Engine repair and rebuilding

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old June 1st, 2014, 02:31 AM
Hantke Hantke is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Forest Grove, Oregon
Truck: I don't own one - YET!
Age: 30
Posts: 219
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 121
Hantke is on a distinguished road
Default 1963 235 V6 1500, short bed

I was talking to the guy down the street for me, and it turns out he has a 1963 GMC Short Step Side pickup with a 235 V6 in it that he may be willing to sell to me, does anybody have any suggestions? it's missing both doors so I will have to find those as well. But it runs and drive (woohoo!!!). Very interested in saving money and buying this. any suggestions? things to look for?

it's been tarped for a long time and has surprisingly little rust as well. Thank you in advanced!

Has anybody used this website before?
http://www.lmctruck.com/features/cbe/CBESSP.htm

Debating on ordering parts from here if i get the truck!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old June 1st, 2014, 03:18 AM
bigblockv6 bigblockv6 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Rohnert Park, ca.
Truck: 1968 KM2500
Posts: 1,325
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 418
bigblockv6 will become famous soon enoughbigblockv6 will become famous soon enough
Default Re: 1963 235 V6 1500, short bed

There is no such engine as a 235 V6 (Chevrolet made a 235 inline six prior to 1963), the standard engine in a 63 pickup was the 305E V6. 1500 shortbed is also questionable as it should be a 1000 series 1/2 ton. The designations changed for 1967 1/2 tons were 1500 series,3/4 ton were 2500 series and 1 tons were 3500 series.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old June 1st, 2014, 03:51 AM
Hantke Hantke is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Forest Grove, Oregon
Truck: I don't own one - YET!
Age: 30
Posts: 219
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 121
Hantke is on a distinguished road
Default Re: 1963 235 V6 1500, short bed

I made the assumption of 1500, that error was on my part entirely, thank you for the info! He didn't say V6, just 235 6 cylinder (so another mistake on my part). I completely didn't think this through before posting, I was really excited about finding the truck and jumped the gun on posting this. Thank you very much! (And thank you for correcting me so I don't look like a complete idiot in the future again) I will do some more research!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old June 1st, 2014, 04:23 AM
bigblockv6 bigblockv6 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Rohnert Park, ca.
Truck: 1968 KM2500
Posts: 1,325
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 418
bigblockv6 will become famous soon enoughbigblockv6 will become famous soon enough
Default Re: 1963 235 V6 1500, short bed

If it has a 235 inline six then at some point the original V6 was replaced, also Canadian models of that era only used Chevrolet engines yet as far as I know the 235 was not produced after 1962. The new 230 inline six came about in 1963.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old June 1st, 2014, 04:29 AM
Hantke Hantke is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Forest Grove, Oregon
Truck: I don't own one - YET!
Age: 30
Posts: 219
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 121
Hantke is on a distinguished road
Default Re: 1963 235 V6 1500, short bed

Okay, thank you! I know he took the 305 out of his 65 and put a 400 in it but got rid of the 305, else I would have tried to get that. Maybe its a 230 and he was mistaken. Once I have some cash saved up I will look into it further for sure, I'd hate to bug him too much without having cash in hand though.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old June 1st, 2014, 04:54 AM
GMCDAC's Avatar
GMCDAC GMCDAC is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Green Valley, east of Rapid City,SD
Truck: I have 4 GMCs, none with a V-6 - YET! Have had 2 in the family.
Age: 67
Posts: 553
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 213
GMCDAC is on a distinguished road
Default Re: 1963 235 V6 1500, short bed

Hi Hantke, I can post pics of 235 and 230 engines if needed for identification if you want. Sounds like it may be a good opportunity to get one of these trucks if the price is right! I have dealt with LMC several times and never had any problems although it seems they get a bad rap a lot on the internet.

DAC
__________________
Doug Crawford
Rapid City, SD

1970 GMC K5 Jimmy Mom drove 30 years
1972 GMC C2500 owned since 1979
1955 GMC 100 driver-project
2006 GMC Yukon Denali---wife's truck

Hope to have a '60 GMC Suburban again someday
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old June 1st, 2014, 11:17 AM
Hantke Hantke is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Forest Grove, Oregon
Truck: I don't own one - YET!
Age: 30
Posts: 219
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 121
Hantke is on a distinguished road
Default Re: 1963 235 V6 1500, short bed

Awesome! thanks again, you guys are great! I think I just landed a new job for the summer (college student) and already have my plans. 1. Get fishing license 2. Pay off last little bit of school debt 3. buy truck

GMCDAC, that would be great, the guy seemed to know what he was talking about (obviously, I didn't think stuff through before posting) but it is always smart to double-check before-hand.

I've been trying to find a good one for quite a while now, and a short - step side is the perfect truck for me, so i got a little bit over - excited when I saw it.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old June 1st, 2014, 09:06 PM
Hantke Hantke is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Forest Grove, Oregon
Truck: I don't own one - YET!
Age: 30
Posts: 219
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 121
Hantke is on a distinguished road
Default Re: 1963 235 V6 1500, short bed

Another thing I just remembered, he said that when he first got it, it wouldn't start, but then his dad poured a little oil down the carburetor and it started and ran fine, they assumed it could be compression.
Is this a serious issue starting to show through? or perhaps a leaky piston ring? I've hear of lots of people doing this (usually 80's fords) but never really knew why. It doesn't need the "oil treatment" right now, just the one time after it had been sitting for quite a while.
__________________
2008 Lancer GTS - DD / Parts runner
1966 Chevy C20 - Winter Project / work truck build?
2006 Suzuki GS500F - finished rebuilding after wreck / soon to be DD
GMC Hunting - I'll get my hands on one of 'em eventually.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old June 2nd, 2014, 04:34 AM
GMCDAC's Avatar
GMCDAC GMCDAC is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Green Valley, east of Rapid City,SD
Truck: I have 4 GMCs, none with a V-6 - YET! Have had 2 in the family.
Age: 67
Posts: 553
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 213
GMCDAC is on a distinguished road
Default Re: 1963 235 V6 1500, short bed

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hantke View Post
Another thing I just remembered, he said that when he first got it, it wouldn't start, but then his dad poured a little oil down the carburetor and it started and ran fine, they assumed it could be compression.
Is this a serious issue starting to show through? or perhaps a leaky piston ring? I've hear of lots of people doing this (usually 80's fords) but never really knew why. It doesn't need the "oil treatment" right now, just the one time after it had been sitting for quite a while.
It is possible the engine had stuck rings and the oil sealed it enough to start and free up the rings. A compression test would be a good idea as it could help determine if the engine is due for a rebuild.

The first two pics are of the mid 1960's 230 that someone installed in my 1955 GMC long before I got it. It really runs nice now after some TLC, cleaning and paint.

The last two pics are a 1957 235 that I got a while back. I don't know what I'm going to do with it, but it was going to scrap and I didn't want to see that happen.

The most obvious difference between the engines is the distributor position is centered front to back on the 235 and it is toward the front on the 230. The lifter cover is one long one on the 235 and it is 2 shorter ones on the 230. Those covers are the sheetmetal plate on the distributor side of the block

Post some pics if possible! Hope this helps.

DAC
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 230 1-12-14 001.jpg (1.19 MB, Multiple views, 4 clicks)
File Type: jpg 230 1-12-14 002.jpg (1.20 MB, Multiple views, 5 clicks)
File Type: jpg 235-3.jpg (465.5 KB, Multiple views, 3 clicks)
File Type: jpg 235-6.jpg (478.6 KB, Multiple views, 5 clicks)
__________________
Doug Crawford
Rapid City, SD

1970 GMC K5 Jimmy Mom drove 30 years
1972 GMC C2500 owned since 1979
1955 GMC 100 driver-project
2006 GMC Yukon Denali---wife's truck

Hope to have a '60 GMC Suburban again someday
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old June 3rd, 2014, 12:47 AM
Hantke Hantke is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Forest Grove, Oregon
Truck: I don't own one - YET!
Age: 30
Posts: 219
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 121
Hantke is on a distinguished road
Default Re: 1963 235 V6 1500, short bed

Quote:
Originally Posted by GMCDAC View Post
It is possible the engine had stuck rings and the oil sealed it enough to start and free up the rings. A compression test would be a good idea as it could help determine if the engine is due for a rebuild.

The first two pics are of the mid 1960's 230 that someone installed in my 1955 GMC long before I got it. It really runs nice now after some TLC, cleaning and paint.

The last two pics are a 1957 235 that I got a while back. I don't know what I'm going to do with it, but it was going to scrap and I didn't want to see that happen.

The most obvious difference between the engines is the distributor position is centered front to back on the 235 and it is toward the front on the 230. The lifter cover is one long one on the 235 and it is 2 shorter ones on the 230. Those covers are the sheetmetal plate on the distributor side of the block

Post some pics if possible! Hope this helps.

DAC
Awesome, thanks!
I just got a confirmed job (step 1, done!) and would like to have cash in hand before I bug him too much, I know the guy is still on the fence about losing one of his projects, so i'd hate to pester him to the point of not getting the truck. As soon as i am nearing the right amount in savings i'm going to go over and help him with a project or two and take some pictures, then i'll be able to post them, and come back with a definite yes / no.
__________________
2008 Lancer GTS - DD / Parts runner
1966 Chevy C20 - Winter Project / work truck build?
2006 Suzuki GS500F - finished rebuilding after wreck / soon to be DD
GMC Hunting - I'll get my hands on one of 'em eventually.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Re: [6066 GMC] Newbie Question - Long Bed vs Short Bed Archiver Previous Forum Posts 0 September 14th, 2009 05:26 AM
Re: [6066 GMC] Newbie Question - Long Bed vs Short Bed Archiver Previous Forum Posts 0 September 14th, 2009 02:17 AM
Re: [6066 GMC] Newbie Question - Long Bed vs Short Bed Archiver Previous Forum Posts 0 September 13th, 2009 07:26 AM
Re: [6066 GMC] Newbie Question - Long Bed vs Short Bed Archiver Previous Forum Posts 0 September 13th, 2009 07:17 AM
Re: [6066 GMC] Newbie Question - Long Bed vs Short Bed Archiver Previous Forum Posts 0 September 13th, 2009 02:29 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd 861731258770|1730058095|0