View Single Post
  #18  
Old April 28th, 2019, 10:26 PM
LEWISMATKIN's Avatar
LEWISMATKIN LEWISMATKIN is offline
-= Site Supporter =-
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: RIDGE MANOR, FLORIDA
Truck: 1965 1002 GMC V6-305E
Age: 64
Posts: 307
Rep Power: 173
LEWISMATKIN will become famous soon enoughLEWISMATKIN will become famous soon enoughLEWISMATKIN will become famous soon enough
Smile Re: Calling all Air Cleaners

powerstroke, this topic has been discussed thouroughly in past posts. Paper filters, if high quality, do a great job of filtering air when maintained properly. I have worked on and aquired parts for both turbocharged Cummins and Detroit diesel and Mack engines. I can unequivocally can state that on most engines, due to their maintence (or lack there of) that I have come across, would have or are benefitting from the oil-bath filters. Yes, they are messy. Yes, they may restrict air flow more than most dry-type filters. But in the engines I personally seen, whether Cummins, DDA, Mack, or h/d gasoline, valve guide/stem and upper cylinder wear was considerablely less than on engines equipped with dry-type filters. I propose that only frequent and proper maintence of any air filter(dry,oil-bath,oil-wetted) is the only sure and true way to protect any engine upon which they are on. This is only my humble opinion, and am not wanting to start this argument afresh. My dad and grandad who had a GMC dealership in Cullman, Ala. during the production run of this series of engine would not order a truck unless it had both an oil-bath air cleaner and a canister oil filter, even thou dry type filters were a RPO during this time.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Last edited by LEWISMATKIN; April 28th, 2019 at 10:39 PM. Reason: additional info from family history
Reply With Quote