![]()  | 
	
		 
  
                 
		 
			
Pay Dues or become a Site Supporter
		
		 
	 | 
		
		
			
  | 
	|||||||
| Transmissions and Rear Ends Three on the tree or four in the floor? Shift it all here. | 
![]()  | 
	
	
| 
		 | 
	Thread Tools | 
| 
		 
			 
			#1  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			I have seem listings for a clutch slave cylinder for a '65-66 3500 series that looks like the one on my 1970 RM7500 (rear engine) chassis ( 401M motor) and Clarke 5/2 transmission. Rock Auto for one...in Wagner and Dorman brands. 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	I am wondering if anyone has a way to determine if there might be some minor differences in one for a 1970. Mine sat for several years, and the piston is now seized at the bottom of the bore. The bore is so rusty that I do not think it is repairable, and I might not even be able to salvage the piston. I have a second slave cylinder, but it is in the same sorry condition. I can have it bored and sleeved if necessary, but if the '65-66 is the came cylinder, I want to go that way I see two listings, which show slightly different bore sizes ( 1.063 and ?0.96? or something similar) I have not tried to measure the bore of the original quite yet., but I see a '15/16' cast into the Delco housing, so i know it is a nominal 1" bore....give or take a lot of rust. Any input is helpful. or call (425) 466-0884 Rod Johnson  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#2  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
||||
		
		
  | 
||||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Use the ".96" listed cylinder--15/16" is .937" so the ".96" cylinder will be closest to the original. If you go with the larger bore--"1.063"=1 1/16" can cause a fluid displacement problem especially if the bore of the master cyl. is smaller than the slave cylinder. I hope this helps you in your decision. 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	 
		 | 
| 
		 
			 
			#3  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Lewis, 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	Thank you for that input, and I agree with the diameter vs. fluid transfer issue. I found a Wagner SC45289 listed at Rock Auto; as fitting a '64 or '65 3000 series, and the picture looks correct. The alternate item ( Dorman CS36124 ) has the slightly larger bore, and the input fitting location is on the top, vs. on the bottom in my particular setup. I then found a source one at Centric, and a bit less expensive than Rock Auto. It has been ordered. I would have been fine with having the local shop putting a sleeve my old cylinder (which they would do for the same cost), but we had not yet found a replacement piston. I am sure both of my original pistons will be in pretty bad shape if I can even get one of them out in one piece. Now off to the local NAPA for some new supply ( remote reservoir setup in this rear engine chassis) ) and return hoses, and to get a new pressure hose fabricated. It seems to very rare for any place to have any parts listings or information on anything bigger than a 4000 series chassis in a roughly 50 year old GMC. Rod J Issaquah, WA  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#4  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			This response was from a very old posting, but the new slave cylinder worked fine after finding a small hydraulic leak. 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	I got an offer I could not refuse, to sell the old monster, so it was necessary to finally fix the clutch issue. Turns out the hydraulic line had worn a pin hole at a frame clamp, so I could not build any significant pressure to operate the slave cylinder. The small amount of hydraulic fluid leaking ran along the frame rail for several feet, to a spring hanger, where it eventually dripped off a spring shackle, into gravel. It was very hard to even see the wet spot, and it took a lot of time to finally find the source of the leak. The old motor home conversion (1970 RM7500-a school bus chassis with a 1954 Spartan Travel trailer for a body) is 38 feet long, so the clutch hydraulic line was over 30 feet of tubing ( rear engine configuration ) . A roll of Ni-Cop tubing and a couple of hours work threading it through the frame cross members solved the problem. The old motor home drove away just fine, with it's 401M purring nicely. I have a spare Allison automatic transmission and adapter plate, starters and a couple of magnum heads, and a magnum exhaust manifold remaining, if anybody is looking for something like that in the Seattle area. Rod J Issaquah, WA  | 
![]()  | 
	
	
| Bookmarks | 
| Tags | 
| clutch hydraulics, slave cylinder | 
| Thread Tools | |
		
  | 
	
		 | 
			 
			Similar Threads
		 | 
	||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post | 
| Re: [6066 GMC] Slave Cylinder Bore Size | Archiver | Previous Forum Posts | 0 | January 5th, 2008 10:12 AM | 
| Re: [6066 GMC] Slave Cylinder Bore Size | Archiver | Previous Forum Posts | 0 | January 5th, 2008 08:40 AM | 
| Re: [6066 GMC] Slave Cylinder Bore Size | Archiver | Previous Forum Posts | 0 | January 5th, 2008 07:34 AM | 
| [6066 GMC] Slave Cylinder Bore Size | Archiver | Previous Forum Posts | 0 | January 5th, 2008 05:43 AM | 
| clutch slave | Archiver | Previous Forum Posts | 0 | October 24th, 2002 02:18 AM |