6066 (1960-1966) GMC Truck Club Bitcoin now accepted here! 
Pay Dues
Pay Dues or become a Site Supporter
 



Go Back   6066 (1960-1966) GMC Truck Club > 6066 GMC Truck Club Forum > GMC V6 and V12 Engines
#Sponsored

GMC V6 and V12 Engines Engine repair and rebuilding

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #21  
Old July 10th, 2016, 04:26 PM
TJ's GMC's Avatar
TJ's GMC TJ's GMC is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Cave Junction, Oregon
Truck: 1964 GMC 1500 LWB Wideside 305E V6.
Posts: 1,341
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 402
TJ's GMC is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Plans for a 478 build.

Quote:
Originally Posted by beerman View Post
I don't think there is a compromise either go lower RPM and boosted or higher RPM and Naturally Aspirated.
My thoughts exactly.
__________________
"Excuse the rust I use my truck"
1964 GMC 1500 305E/sm420 4 barrel intake mod and dual exhaust.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

1964 Chevy C20 292/SM420
1966 Chevy C10 292 hotrod 6/TKO600


My youtube channel aka Military Chevy:
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old July 10th, 2016, 05:11 PM
Charon Charon is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Spirit lake. Idaho
Truck: Only chevy powered trucks
Posts: 87
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
Charon is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Plans for a 478 build.

The biggest problem with the v6. And the main reason it's made so heavy is it's design can't be balanced. The rotational mass can. But the firing pulses can't counterbalance each other. The engine actually shakes front to back. Kind of like a rocking chair. This is why they don't feel smooth at higher rpms. The faster you turn it the more violent the rocking becomes. You could lighten up the rotational mass. And the rocking motion would be worse as the speed increased. Its the weight that makes these engines feel half smooth.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old July 10th, 2016, 06:29 PM
bigblockv6 bigblockv6 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Rohnert Park, ca.
Truck: 1968 KM2500
Posts: 1,325
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 418
bigblockv6 will become famous soon enoughbigblockv6 will become famous soon enough
Default Re: Plans for a 478 build.

I've got the custom cam specs for my 478. I'll have to send you a copy of the custom cam specs for my 478 along with the part number for longer valve springs from Comp Cams , they are actually Ford 390 valve springs
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old July 10th, 2016, 06:55 PM
turbobill turbobill is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: northern NY when not flying
Truck: 1968 HM80 with a 478M and a few engines plus a Toro-Flow
Posts: 99
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 97
turbobill is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Plans for a 478 build.

The cost of making a 478 (or any other GMC big block V6) make power at high revs will be much higher than making the same power at low revs by boost. I can certainly see the limited breathing of any of the V6 heads nullifying some, if not much of the gains made through headers, 4 bbl carbs and cams.

In addition, to make power at high revs will require tons of money to be spent on either making the heavy parts in the bottom end live, or be replaced with custom/aftermarket stuff. Aside from that, you'll still have to buy/source/make the headers and intake as well as pay for a custom ground cam.

Under no conditions would I try to make a 478 run at over 3600 RPM with the stock bottom end or valves, even in new condition.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old July 10th, 2016, 07:02 PM
bigblockv6 bigblockv6 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Rohnert Park, ca.
Truck: 1968 KM2500
Posts: 1,325
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 418
bigblockv6 will become famous soon enoughbigblockv6 will become famous soon enough
Default Re: Plans for a 478 build.

I would say 3700 rpms is max for the 478, mine is good for 4500 but only if I get rid of those hollow stem sodium filled exhaust valves which I will absolutely have to do. Some 478's back in the day had the governors blocked and would get over revved and end up sucking valves.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old July 10th, 2016, 11:43 PM
Charon Charon is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Spirit lake. Idaho
Truck: Only chevy powered trucks
Posts: 87
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
Charon is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Plans for a 478 build.

I thought you used cat valves in your 478. Not sure which. I looked at all the cat specs and none are close to a v6 gmc
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old July 11th, 2016, 12:08 AM
bigblockv6 bigblockv6 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Rohnert Park, ca.
Truck: 1968 KM2500
Posts: 1,325
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 418
bigblockv6 will become famous soon enoughbigblockv6 will become famous soon enough
Default Re: Plans for a 478 build.

Never used Cat valves, someone else on the site did and gave me the part numbers which I can't find, so I'm thinking of going with some custom stainless steel valves from Manley.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old July 11th, 2016, 12:18 AM
beerman beerman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Yardville, NJ
Truck: 1968 GMC K1500 305E SWB
Posts: 47
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 69
beerman is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Plans for a 478 build.

Are these the ones?

http://6066gmcclub.com/showthread.php?t=38705
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old July 11th, 2016, 12:24 AM
bigblockv6 bigblockv6 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Rohnert Park, ca.
Truck: 1968 KM2500
Posts: 1,325
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 418
bigblockv6 will become famous soon enoughbigblockv6 will become famous soon enough
Default Re: Plans for a 478 build.

Beerman, those most likely are the valves, thanks for digging it up
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old July 11th, 2016, 01:49 AM
TJ's GMC's Avatar
TJ's GMC TJ's GMC is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Cave Junction, Oregon
Truck: 1964 GMC 1500 LWB Wideside 305E V6.
Posts: 1,341
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 402
TJ's GMC is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Plans for a 478 build.

I never rev my 305 past 3500! I wouldn't dream of reving a 478 past that either. haha

Another thing I was considering was fuel injection. The MSD injection is spendy, but a sweet unit. Be great on a motor that size. I've been wanting to make headers for my 305 for the cool factor, but haven't gotten around to it.

Maybe I'll just do nitrous on the 478.
__________________
"Excuse the rust I use my truck"
1964 GMC 1500 305E/sm420 4 barrel intake mod and dual exhaust.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

1964 Chevy C20 292/SM420
1966 Chevy C10 292 hotrod 6/TKO600


My youtube channel aka Military Chevy:
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
can you build a gmc 401 or 478 to rev higher than 4000 rpm Archiver Previous Forum Posts 15 December 13th, 2012 01:46 AM
Jamboree Plans Archiver Previous Forum Posts 0 June 3rd, 2005 03:33 AM
Re: [OLDIHC:] Flatbed plans Archiver Previous Forum Posts 0 October 25th, 2001 03:57 PM
Flatbed plans Archiver Previous Forum Posts 0 October 25th, 2001 02:55 AM
Bed plans Archiver Previous Forum Posts 0 July 23rd, 2001 12:33 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd 871731258770|1730209262|0