6066 (1960-1966) GMC Truck Club Bitcoin now accepted here! 
Pay Dues
Pay Dues or become a Site Supporter
 



Go Back   6066 (1960-1966) GMC Truck Club > 6066 GMC Truck Club Forum > GMC V6 and V12 Engines


GMC V6 and V12 Engines Engine repair and rebuilding

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #51  
Old September 6th, 2016, 12:30 AM
1969_CM2590D's Avatar
1969_CM2590D 1969_CM2590D is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Versailles, KY
Truck: 1969 305E V-6 C2500 Wideside
Age: 62
Posts: 53
Rep Power: 77
1969_CM2590D is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Too much timing?

Quote:
Originally Posted by badhabit
.DO NOT HOOK YOUR VAC ADVANCE UP TO NORMAL VACUUM--- this will cause the idle to race and really run flat, because your advance is all in at idle-- not as you accelarate.

This will only happen if you select the wrong VA can. Having full vacuum advance at idle will increase the VE, reduce the EGT's and make the idle smoother. A former GM engineer wrote a nice piece on vacuum advance:


Quotation thanks to JohnZ

As many of you are aware, timing and vacuum advance is one of my favorite subjects, as I was involved in the development of some of those systems in my GM days and I understand it. Many people don't, as there has been very little written about it anywhere that makes sense, and as a result, a lot of folks are under the misunderstanding that vacuum advance somehow compromises performance. Nothing could be further from the truth. I finally sat down the other day and wrote up a primer on the subject, with the objective of helping more folks to understand vacuum advance and how it works together with initial timing and centrifugal advance to optimize all-around operation and performance. I have this as a Word document if anyone wants it sent to them - I've cut-and-pasted it here; it's long, but hopefully it's also informative.

TIMING AND VACUUM ADVANCE 101

The most important concept to understand is that lean mixtures, such as at idle and steady highway cruise, take longer to burn than rich mixtures; idle in particular, as idle mixture is affected by exhaust gas dilution. This requires that lean mixtures have "the fire lit" earlier in the compression cycle (spark timing advanced), allowing more burn time so that peak cylinder pressure is reached just after TDC for peak efficiency and reduced exhaust gas temperature (wasted combustion energy). Rich mixtures, on the other hand, burn faster than lean mixtures, so they need to have "the fire lit" later in the compression cycle (spark timing retarded slightly) so maximum cylinder pressure is still achieved at the same point after TDC as with the lean mixture, for maximum efficiency.

The centrifugal advance system in a distributor advances spark timing purely as a function of engine rpm (irrespective of engine load or operating conditions), with the amount of advance and the rate at which it comes in determined by the weights and springs on top of the autocam mechanism. The amount of advance added by the distributor, combined with initial static timing, is "total timing" (i.e., the 34-36 degrees at high rpm that most SBC's like). Vacuum advance has absolutely nothing to do with total timing or performance, as when the throttle is opened, manifold vacuum drops essentially to zero, and the vacuum advance drops out entirely; it has no part in the "total timing" equation.

At idle, the engine needs additional spark advance in order to fire that lean, diluted mixture earlier in order to develop maximum cylinder pressure at the proper point, so the vacuum advance can (connected to manifold vacuum, not "ported" vacuum - more on that aberration later) is activated by the high manifold vacuum, and adds about 15 degrees of spark advance, on top of the initial static timing setting (i.e., if your static timing is at 10 degrees, at idle it's actually around 25 degrees with the vacuum advance connected). The same thing occurs at steady-state highway cruise; the mixture is lean, takes longer to burn, the load on the engine is low, the manifold vacuum is high, so the vacuum advance is again deployed, and if you had a timing light set up so you could see the balancer as you were going down the highway, you'd see about 50 degrees advance (10 degrees initial, 20-25 degrees from the centrifugal advance, and 15 degrees from the vacuum advance) at steady-state cruise (it only takes about 40 horsepower to cruise at 50mph).

When you accelerate, the mixture is instantly enriched (by the accelerator pump, power valve, etc.), burns faster, doesn't need the additional spark advance, and when the throttle plates open, manifold vacuum drops, and the vacuum advance can returns to zero, retarding the spark timing back to what is provided by the initial static timing plus the centrifugal advance provided by the distributor at that engine rpm; the vacuum advance doesn't come back into play until you back off the gas and manifold vacuum increases again as you return to steady-state cruise, when the mixture again becomes lean.

The key difference is that centrifugal advance (in the distributor autocam via weights and springs) is purely rpm-sensitive; nothing changes it except changes in rpm. Vacuum advance, on the other hand, responds to engine load and rapidly-changing operating conditions, providing the correct degree of spark advance at any point in time based on engine load, to deal with both lean and rich mixture conditions. By today's terms, this was a relatively crude mechanical system, but it did a good job of optimizing engine efficiency, throttle response, fuel economy, and idle cooling, with absolutely ZERO effect on wide-open throttle performance, as vacuum advance is inoperative under wide-open throttle conditions. In modern cars with computerized engine controllers, all those sensors and the controller change both mixture and spark timing 50 to 100 times per second, and we don't even HAVE a distributor any more - it's all electronic.

Now, to the widely-misunderstood manifold-vs.-ported vacuum aberration. After 30-40 years of controlling vacuum advance with full manifold vacuum, along came emissions requirements, years before catalytic converter technology had been developed, and all manner of crude band-aid systems were developed to try and reduce hydrocarbons and oxides of nitrogen in the exhaust stream. One of these band-aids was "ported spark", which moved the vacuum pickup orifice in the carburetor venturi from below the throttle plate (where it was exposed to full manifold vacuum at idle) to above the throttle plate, where it saw no manifold vacuum at all at idle. This meant the vacuum advance was inoperative at idle (retarding spark timing from its optimum value), and these applications also had VERY low initial static timing (usually 4 degrees or less, and some actually were set at 2 degrees AFTER TDC). This was done in order to increase exhaust gas temperature (due to "lighting the fire late") to improve the effectiveness of the "afterburning" of hydrocarbons by the air injected into the exhaust manifolds by the A.I.R. system; as a result, these engines ran like crap, and an enormous amount of wasted heat energy was transferred through the exhaust port walls into the coolant, causing them to run hot at idle - cylinder pressure fell off, engine temperatures went up, combustion efficiency went down the drain, and fuel economy went down with it.

If you look at the centrifugal advance calibrations for these "ported spark, late-timed" engines, you'll see that instead of having 20 degrees of advance, they had up to 34 degrees of advance in the distributor, in order to get back to the 34-36 degrees "total timing" at high rpm wide-open throttle to get some of the performance back. The vacuum advance still worked at steady-state highway cruise (lean mixture = low emissions), but it was inoperative at idle, which caused all manner of problems - "ported vacuum" was strictly an early, pre-converter crude emissions strategy, and nothing more.

What about the Harry high-school non-vacuum advance polished billet "whizbang" distributors you see in the Summit and Jeg's catalogs? They're JUNK on a street-driven car, but some people keep buying them because they're "race car" parts, so they must be "good for my car" - they're NOT. "Race cars" run at wide-open throttle, rich mixture, full load, and high rpm all the time, so they don't need a system (vacuum advance) to deal with the full range of driving conditions encountered in street operation. Anyone driving a street-driven car without manifold-connected vacuum advance is sacrificing idle cooling, throttle response, engine efficiency, and fuel economy, probably because they don't understand what vacuum advance is, how it works, and what it's for - there are lots of long-time experienced "mechanics" who don't understand the principles and operation of vacuum advance either, so they're not alone.

Vacuum advance calibrations are different between stock engines and modified engines, especially if you have a lot of cam and have relatively low manifold vacuum at idle. Most stock vacuum advance cans aren’t fully-deployed until they see about 15” Hg. Manifold vacuum, so those cans don’t work very well on a modified engine; with less than 15” Hg. at a rough idle, the stock can will “dither” in and out in response to the rapidly-changing manifold vacuum, constantly varying the amount of vacuum advance, which creates an unstable idle. Modified engines with more cam that generate less than 15” Hg. of vacuum at idle need a vacuum advance can that’s fully-deployed at least 1”, preferably 2” of vacuum less than idle vacuum level so idle advance is solid and stable; the Echlin #VC-1810 advance can (about $10 at NAPA) provides the same amount of advance as the stock can (15 degrees), but is fully-deployed at only 8” of vacuum, so there is no variation in idle timing even with a stout cam.

For peak engine performance, driveability, idle cooling and efficiency in a street-driven car, you need vacuum advance, connected to full manifold vacuum. Absolutely. Positively. Don't ask Summit or Jeg's about it – they don’t understand it, they're on commission, and they want to sell "race car" parts.
__________________
Dennis Nichols

1969 GMC CM2500
2000 Toyota Land Cruiser
1964 VW Karmann Ghia Coupe
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old September 6th, 2016, 01:15 AM
TJ's GMC's Avatar
TJ's GMC TJ's GMC is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Cave Junction, Oregon
Truck: 1964 GMC 1500 LWB Wideside 305E V6.
Posts: 1,341
Rep Power: 399
TJ's GMC is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Too much timing?

I tried my engine(305E with a 600 cfm 4 barrel and modded magnum manifold) on Manifold vacuum advance and it would hesitate off idle after idling for so long. Thing is, weather on Ported or Manifold....both are useless under load. Under load your relying on the weights in the dizzy for advance. The vacuum timing only comes in while cruising at a constant set speed to aid in power and mileage. Therefore, not Enough or to Much can have an affect on power and mileage. Which is why I backed mine down to 8 initial and left it on Ported timing. I did do 12 initial once, but it felt like to much and didn't really make a difference, so I left it at 8-10. 4-6 is is factory for stock, but with the extra fuel I have found advancing a little helps. Also the addition of an HEI makes a difference in itself. That and hot wires and plugs will aid in power. I still need to open the plugs in mine a tad more, but I haven't as it runs like a top and I drive it Everyday...so if it ain't broke I don't fix it. lol If I had a dyno that would be something I would play with and get some paper results.
__________________
"Excuse the rust I use my truck"
1964 GMC 1500 305E/sm420 4 barrel intake mod and dual exhaust.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

1964 Chevy C20 292/SM420
1966 Chevy C10 292 hotrod 6/TKO600


My youtube channel aka Military Chevy:
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Last edited by TJ's GMC; September 6th, 2016 at 02:30 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old September 6th, 2016, 01:41 AM
bigblockv6 bigblockv6 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Rohnert Park, ca.
Truck: 1968 KM2500
Posts: 1,325
Rep Power: 415
bigblockv6 will become famous soon enoughbigblockv6 will become famous soon enough
Default Re: Too much timing?

TJ, when you decide to open up the plugs, I have found the correct plugs with larger gaps. I'm running AC-R44XLS6 plugs that take .060 gaps for HEI applications in my 478M.
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old September 6th, 2016, 02:30 AM
TJ's GMC's Avatar
TJ's GMC TJ's GMC is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Cave Junction, Oregon
Truck: 1964 GMC 1500 LWB Wideside 305E V6.
Posts: 1,341
Rep Power: 399
TJ's GMC is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Too much timing?

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigblockv6 View Post
TJ, when you decide to open up the plugs, I have found the correct plugs with larger gaps. I'm running AC-R44XLS6 plugs that take .060 gaps for HEI applications in my 478M.
That's one big sparky! lol
__________________
"Excuse the rust I use my truck"
1964 GMC 1500 305E/sm420 4 barrel intake mod and dual exhaust.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

1964 Chevy C20 292/SM420
1966 Chevy C10 292 hotrod 6/TKO600


My youtube channel aka Military Chevy:
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old March 22nd, 2023, 06:05 PM
krazzz krazzz is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2023
Location: Ludington, MI
Truck: 1964 1000
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 0
krazzz is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Too much timing?

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1969_CM2590D View Post
Quote:

For peak engine performance, driveability, idle cooling and efficiency in a street-driven car, you need vacuum advance, connected to full manifold vacuum. Absolutely. Positively. Don't ask Summit or Jeg's about it – they don’t understand it, they're on commission, and they want to sell "race car" parts.
[/B]
Thank you for the wonderful write-up 1969_CM2590D. I think I will take your suggestion and go with manifold vacuum. What do you recommend I set the initial timing to? The factory spec is 7.5 on mine. And to be clear, I still set the timing with the vacuum advance disconnected, correct?
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old March 29th, 2023, 05:19 PM
jerrspud jerrspud is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Boise Idaho
Truck: 1963 1500 custom cab
Age: 49
Posts: 33
Rep Power: 39
jerrspud is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Too much timing?

Quote:
Originally Posted by krazzz View Post
Thank you for the wonderful write-up 1969_CM2590D. I think I will take your suggestion and go with manifold vacuum. What do you recommend I set the initial timing to? The factory spec is 7.5 on mine. And to be clear, I still set the timing with the vacuum advance disconnected, correct?
this is a 6+ year old tread
I just adjusted the timing on my 305E. I think I set the initial timing (yes with the vacuum disconnect) to around 10 degrees and then used the manifold vacuum. The advantage is that you get timing added to your idle after you start the engine, but you won't have hard start issues due to too much advance when it's turning over.
__________________
Jerr
1963 305 V6 1500

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Timing Archiver Previous Forum Posts 1 May 28th, 2012 02:04 AM
Timing Archiver Previous Forum Posts 0 August 16th, 2008 01:17 AM
Timing Archiver Previous Forum Posts 0 August 16th, 2008 01:08 AM
RE: timing Archiver Previous Forum Posts 0 October 23rd, 2002 01:07 AM
Timing is everything Archiver Previous Forum Posts 0 March 4th, 2001 04:37 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd 671711554703|1710440214|0