6066 (1960-1966) GMC Truck Club Bitcoin now accepted here! 
Pay Dues
Pay Dues or become a Site Supporter
 



Go Back   6066 (1960-1966) GMC Truck Club > 6066 GMC Truck Club Forum > GMC V6 and V12 Engines


GMC V6 and V12 Engines Engine repair and rebuilding

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old March 28th, 2014, 03:34 AM
pigslayer pigslayer is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Eggleston VA
Truck: 69
Age: 34
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 66
pigslayer is on a distinguished road
Default 351 conversion

lookin on craigslist the other day and found what I was told was a 69 model 351e that was bolted to a three speed tranny. so I suspect it was from a half ton or 3/4 ton. I went and looked at the engine and it looked pretty good. fairly clean. removed the oil fill plug and it looked good on the inside. the clutch didn't look to have taken much abuse. at least the current flywheel hasn't. so I bought it reasonable. got it home. looked it over. got it pretty much ready to run. haven't tried yet. but I guess I put the cart ahead of the horse. I'm not sure if this thing will even work in my truck. what I want to put it in is a 48 chevy 3800. it has the 216 in it now and I wanted an upgrade. I know i'll need to fab some motor mounts. but will this work with my transmission or am I now in need of that too. it has a 4 speed with the reverse down and left. I'm assuming it's a 420. so is this possible or do I need to let it go. thanks in advance.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old March 28th, 2014, 07:13 AM
bigblockv6 bigblockv6 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Rohnert Park, ca.
Truck: 1968 KM2500
Posts: 1,325
Rep Power: 415
bigblockv6 will become famous soon enoughbigblockv6 will become famous soon enough
Default Re: 351 conversion

The SM-420 was used from 1947-67, sounds like your 48 has this trans. Don't think your conversion is far fetched, GMC used to promote repowering older trucks and other brands with it's V6.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old March 28th, 2014, 06:36 PM
Culver Adams Culver Adams is offline
-= Dues Paid =-
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Truck: 1961 3/4 ton 4x4 pickup
Posts: 50
Rep Power: 82
Culver Adams is on a distinguished road
Default Re: 351 conversion

I don't know much beyond my own experience.

I do know a 216 I6, even if kept full of oil and coolant and not over revved, will show wear. (But how many other engines are friendly enough to let average, motivated mechanics rebuild bearings on a cold night by flashlight?)

My 478 V6, on the other hand, just laughs when I try to find where it is wearing itself out. But it's a brute and your engine is brute's smaller brother. You may want to check the weight of 351 versus 216 and then find what parts it wants to eat for lunch. (Should I mention that today I am welding my 1961 GMC K1500's front upper shock absorber mounting bracket--now in two pieces, thanks to 478 engine weight on top and the winter of winters pot holes on the bottom?) (Photo attached.)

My opinion: If you want the most durable low RPM high torque engine, you can't do much better than what you just bought and SM420, assuming you can use it's low gear and don't need overdrive, is it's perfect mate. They could be going to the prom together.

Regards and Please don't forget how much this group likes photos ;-)

Culver Adams
Minneapolis, MN (Come for the lunker Walleyes: stay for the shock absorber mounting bracket repairs.)
1961 GMC K1500 with (laughing) 478 V6 and (learning how to dance for the prom) SM420
Attached Images
File Type: jpg DSC05483.JPG (2.98 MB, Multiple views, 8 clicks)
File Type: jpg DSC05479.JPG (3.10 MB, Multiple views, 3 clicks)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old March 29th, 2014, 05:45 PM
pigslayer pigslayer is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Eggleston VA
Truck: 69
Age: 34
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 66
pigslayer is on a distinguished road
Default Re: 351 conversion

well those were my thoughts. the chevy body style I have was from 1947-1953. and that was the start date of the 420 tranny. and the fact that the reverse is located where it is makes me believe it should work. also I have some friends who say that a sbc would bolt up to this transmission so I feel pretty sure I can make it work. I can make a few modifications if need be. I'm a machinist with a shop in my back yard so things within reason can be changed. turned my flywheel last night just waitin for good weather to come so I can bolt her together and give it a crank. this engine is a bit heavier but only around 250 pounds the best I can tell. for a 1 ton I'm sure this wouldn't be noticed.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old March 31st, 2014, 02:00 AM
pigslayer pigslayer is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Eggleston VA
Truck: 69
Age: 34
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 66
pigslayer is on a distinguished road
Default Re: 351 conversion

another little question I'm sure someone here could help me with. I have found a gmc transmission from what I am being told came out of a larger truck. dump truck or whatever. if I did decide to use this transmission would the bell housing from the donor 478 mount up to the 351? and flywheel? would I need that as well? what transmission is this? how many speeds? gearing? below is a picture of the transmission in question and the donor engine. any help would be appreciated.

gmc1.jpg

gmc2.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old March 31st, 2014, 03:15 AM
bigblockv6 bigblockv6 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Rohnert Park, ca.
Truck: 1968 KM2500
Posts: 1,325
Rep Power: 415
bigblockv6 will become famous soon enoughbigblockv6 will become famous soon enough
Default Re: 351 conversion

The 478 bellhousing will bolt up to the 351 but the 478 flywheel won't. The 351 has a standard GM 6 bolt pattern while the 478 has an 8 bolt pattern to the crank and also has external balancing. The only way to make this work would be to find a 401 flywheel from a similar application with the 6 bolt pattern.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old April 2nd, 2014, 01:37 AM
pigslayer pigslayer is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Eggleston VA
Truck: 69
Age: 34
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 66
pigslayer is on a distinguished road
Default Re: 351 conversion

well tried to fire the ol girl up today. I believe she's a runner. didn't hear it run long though. appears the needle and seat are missing out of the carb. so it blows gas back towards the bell housing when it fires. but seemed solid. no smoke. no noises. smooth sound when cranked. hopefully this is an easy fix. found a kit at napa. just wish I could just buy the seat and needle. oh well.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old April 2nd, 2014, 01:54 AM
Culver Adams Culver Adams is offline
-= Dues Paid =-
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Truck: 1961 3/4 ton 4x4 pickup
Posts: 50
Rep Power: 82
Culver Adams is on a distinguished road
Default Re: 351 conversion

(....tried to fire the ol girl up....believe she's a runner....seemed solid....no smoke....no noises....smooth sound....)

Hi, Pigslayer,

That sweetheart wants to run.

Somewhere I heard, in the days before my time, when a truck was at the stage your's is at, a guy would pull the carb, get one of the neighborhood kids to sit aside the engine to pour gasoline from a tin can into the intake manifold, and the guy would drive the truck around just to get it driving. That was before OSHA and a bunch of other reasons to not do this now. But I sense you are on the edge of discovery and celebration.

Way to go.

Regards,

Culver
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old April 2nd, 2014, 02:48 AM
pigslayer pigslayer is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Eggleston VA
Truck: 69
Age: 34
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 66
pigslayer is on a distinguished road
Default Re: 351 conversion

thanks culver. yeah I think she wants to go. it's hangin from a chain right now so it wouldn't be so hard to pour gas in it. but I had an uncle who was tryin this trick once and the engine backfired through the intake and caught his gas can on fire. not willing to take that risk myself. I'm not very pretty but I doubt this would improve anything.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old April 2nd, 2014, 03:27 AM
Culver Adams Culver Adams is offline
-= Dues Paid =-
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Truck: 1961 3/4 ton 4x4 pickup
Posts: 50
Rep Power: 82
Culver Adams is on a distinguished road
Default Re: 351 conversion

(....not willing to take that risk....)

Hi Pigslayer,

Very wise.

Regards,

Culver
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Question for Peter Chronis Ref: 305 to 351 conversion Archiver Previous Forum Posts 0 June 16th, 2003 02:27 AM
Re: [6066 GMC Truck] Question for Peter Chronis Ref: 305 to 351 conversion Archiver Previous Forum Posts 0 June 15th, 2003 01:51 AM
Re: [6066 GMC Truck] Question for Peter Chronis Ref: 305 to 351 conversion Archiver Previous Forum Posts 0 June 15th, 2003 01:48 AM
Re: [6066 GMC Truck] 60 GMC 305A conversion to a 351 Archiver Previous Forum Posts 0 June 9th, 2003 01:57 AM
60 GMC 305A conversion to a 351 Archiver Previous Forum Posts 0 June 8th, 2003 01:52 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd 581714493741|1713313018|0